The G20 Aftermath: “Anarchist” is just another word for “Coward”

So, as expected, the G20 Summit protests turned into a complete farce. So-called “peaceful protests” turned violent, and of course the jobless hippies who were arrested will no doubt claim we live in a “police state”, as they made themselves martyrs to their nonsense cause (which they are completely clueless about). And before I even hear ONE alternate viewpoint from the great unwashed… have you seen the pictures?

Taken from the Toronto Star… masked “anarchists”, too cowardly to show their faces, destroy a cop car. Yeah, that’ll show the governments of the world! You really taught them a lesson on world economics, by wrecking a cop car.

And here, we see another coward, a woman apparently (I couldn’t tell, you seen the clothes that so-called “men” wear these days? could very well have been a man in those tights), destroying the window of what was reported to be a Winners. Again, how is that protesting world economics? You’re just breaking a window because you can get away with it.

Would any of these losers attempt this type of vandalism if there weren’t a million people in a tightly condensed area, distracting the police? No, of course they wouldn’t. “Anarchists” are pathetic cowards, dregs of society that should be put down. The way I see it, for every window they broke, that should be a broken bone administered by a police baton. Every car set on fire should have been matched with the burned body of an “anarchist”. But the police did their jobs according to our civilized laws, they used rubber bullets when they should have used hollow-points, and unfortunately didn’t arrest every single one of them to be tried for their crimes.

Look at this joke of a human. Barely a man, surrounded by other pathetic human garbage, including that thing on the left that looks like his favourite past-time includes used needles. You think ANY of these people would survive if it were true anarchy? They wouldn’t, not even for a minute. Organized crime would take over and use every single one of these losers as snot-rags before tossing them in the nearest dumpster, none of them man enough to really fight back. They’d be dead within weeks. The irony is that the very society they protest is what keeps them alive and gives them the rights and freedoms to do what they’re doing. Anarchy will never work. People in general, as shown by displays like this, are far too stupid to govern themselves.

5 Responses to “The G20 Aftermath: “Anarchist” is just another word for “Coward””

  1. xnoxcluex Says:

    Wow. I loved reading this article.
    I totally agree with you.What on earth are these people doing?
    Supporting their whatever causes by…
    Destroying the city???????
    These people are just using the G20 as an excuse so they can, as you said, get away with it in the masses of people.
    And I also agree that anarchy will never work.
    Well written! I hope they’ll be able to clean up the mess so everyone can go downtown again.

  2. anastasia Says:

    I totally agree. These people don’t even function like “real” human beings. Jobs, families< society. They live for this. The only reason we need to spend millions of dollars for security is because of these low-lifes. Too bad they couldn't be caught and held responsible for the damages they do. Make them make reparations to the store owners and employees of the stores they damage.

    • I doubt they could have made reparations anyway, I’m betting between them all, they couldn’t come up with more than enough to purchase a pack of cigarettes. That’s what happens when you’re unemployed.

  3. Winners, Starbucks, CIBC, and likely countless other large chain capitalist businesses. Think about it folks, why were the independent “Ma and Pa” establishments not vandalized? I’m against black blocheads and their choice of message delivery. But I’m not against Anarchism I am all for it…it allows me to think for myself, do for myself and be myself. Understand the true meaning behinds the labels before you use them!

    • None of these people were thinking for themselves (they were definitely doing it for themselves though, nothing selfless about those acts, they were clearly doing it without regard for anyone else). It’s laughable to think that being a part of any group means “thinking for yourself”. Your group is just thinking differently than another group, but the group as the whole are still no different than any other group or mindset (it’d be like saying that Atheists are free-thinkers and Catholics are not, it’s two groups both believing something they were told by somebody at some time in their life). As for them attacking corporations, this is all while they’re carrying a bottle of water (no doubt bottled by a corporation) or Gatorade as I’d seen in one picture. They’re hypocrites. The only way to truly reject corporations is to stop purchasing anything from anywhere. Go out in the woods with a knife and hunt all your food, live without electricity. I can’t take ANYONE with a “down with Corporations” attitude seriously until they do that. Even “Ma and Pa establishments” sell corporate products (Coke? Pepsi?), so purchasing anything anywhere is supporting at least one corporation. Using the Internet supports multiple corporations. You’re not an Anarchist, or a free-thinker. Just another person talking a big game without a thought in your head that wasn’t put there by someone else.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: